p. −
2228-7132
Vol.32/No.3
0.907, NRMSE< 28.20 %). Finally, NNI was calculated using measured (NNIo) and simulated (NNIp) data over the two seasons. Comparing the NNIp versus the NNIo revealed that accuracy of the estimated values was acceptable based on the R2and NRMSE criteria (>0.638 and <20.86, respectively) in both years.]]>
p. 283−303
2228-7132
Vol.32/No.3
p. 305−318
2228-7132
Vol.32/No.3
Cu> Fe> Mn> P> N> K = Ca> Mg> B, and Zn> Mn = Fe = Cu> N = P> B > K> Mg > Ca, respectively. These results showed that there was a high degree of similarity between the two methods in interpreting the results of leaf analysis. After identifying the negative indices of some micronutrients (Zn, Fe, Mn, and Cu), a factorial field validation experiment was conducted with foliar application of Fe, Zn, Cu, and Mn using a randomized complete block design with three replications in two separate fields, with a total number of 96 plots, in 2015-2016. The results of the validation experiment showed marked decrease in the DRIS and DOP indices, indicating a more balanced concentration of nutrients. The order of the nutrients requirement in the DRIS method was Mg> P> N = K> Fe = B> Mn = Zn> Ca = Cu and in the DOP method Mg > N > Mn > P > K = Fe = Cu > Zn = B > Ca, which indicated the correct diagnosis of micronutrients deficiency by both studied methods. Micronutrients treatment in the validation test led to 28% increase in yield by balancing the nutrients. Since micronutrients, especially Zn, ranked the first priority of the deficiency for wheat in Moghan area, micronutrients should be used along with the phosphorus and nitrogen fertilizers.]]>
p. 319−329
2228-7132
Vol.32/No.3
p. 331−341
2228-7132
Vol.32/No.3
p. 343−359
2228-7132
Vol.32/No.3
p. 361−372
2228-7132
Vol.32/No.3
p. 373−381
2228-7132
Vol.32/No.3
p. 383−392
2228-7132
Vol.32/No.3
p. 393−402
2228-7132
Vol.32/No.3
p. 403−416
2228-7132
Vol.32/No.3
p. 417−430
2228-7132
Vol.32/No.3