Comparison of Fertigation and Soil Application of Nutrients in WheatCrop

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Scientific member of Fars Agriculture and Resources Research Center

Abstract

The objective of this research was to compare the effects of fertigationand soil application methods of nitrogen, iron, manganese, and zinc on wheat production and its growth parameters.The study was conducted in a stripe statistical design by use of 5 pipelines as triple line-source sprinkle irrigation. Treatments were: T1 = fertigationin 3 meters distance from fertilizer injection line, T2 = fertigationin 6 meters distance from injection line, T3 = fertigationin 9 meters distance from injection line, T4= soil application in 3 meters distance from irrigation line, T5= soil application in 6 meters distance from irrigation line,and T6were nutrients soil application in 9 meters fromirrigation line.In fertigation method, nitrogen source was ammonium nitrate whileiron, manganese and zinc were chelated sources injected into the middle pipeline by use of a Venturi system.In soil application method, 425, 110, 100 and 20 kg.ha-1of Urea, Triple Super Phosphate, Potassiun Sulfate and Zinc Sulfate, respectively, were applied to the soil and were watered with a sprinkler system. Fertilizers used were based on the soil test.The results showed that by increasing ammonium nitrateconcentrations, total yield, grain yield, and 1000 grain weight increased. The highest yield (7623 kg ha-1), the highest 1000-grain weight (36.3 g) and the highest grain protein content (15.4%) were obtained from the first fertigation treatment i.e.fertigationin 3 meters distance from injection pipelineand application of 170 kgammonium nitrate ha-1.The results showed that the rate of nitrate applied in fertigation systemwashighly correlated with1000-grain weight, grain yield, and total yield.The results also indicated that zinc and manganese foliar fertilization were more effective than soil application. More detailed studies about the economic aspects seem to be necessary.

Keywords


  1. امامی‌، ع.‌ 1375. روش‌های‌ تجزیة‌ گیاه‌. نشریه‌ فنی‌ شماره‌ 982. موسسة‌ تحقیقات‌ خاک‌ و آب‌، تهران، ایران، 128 صفحه.
  2. علی‌احیایی، م. و بهبهانی زاده، ع. ا. 1373. شرح روش‌های تجزیة شیمیایی خاک، جلد 1، نشریه شماره 893. موسسة تحقیقات خاک و آب تهران، ایران، 128 صفحه.
  3. واعظی، ع. ر. 1379. اثر مصرف کودهای شیمیایی به روش کود آبیاری بر بازده مصرف کودها، کارایی مصرف آب و عملکرد ذرت علوفه‌ای. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد خاکشناسی، دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
  4. Engel, R.1997.Response of oat to water and nitrogen. Fertilizer facts, 15:1-2.
  5. Gheysari, M., Mirlatifi, S. M., Bannayan, M., Homaee, M. and Hoogenboom, G. 2010. Interaction of water and nitrogen on maize grown for silage. Agricultural Water Management. 97: 1411-1710.
  6. Haefele, S. M., Jabba, S.M.A., Siopongco, J.D.L.C., Tirol-Padre, A., Amarante, S.T., StaCruz, P.C. and Cosico, W.C. 2008.
  7. Nitrogen use efficiency in selected rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes under different water regimes and nitrogen levels. Field Crops Research. 107: 137-146.
  8. Hanks, R. J., J. Keller, V. P. Rasmussen and B. D. Wilson 1976. Line source sprinkler for continious variable irrigation crop production studies. Soil sci. soci. Am. J., 40:426-429.
  9. Hanks, R. J., D.V. Sisson, R. L. Hurst, and K.G. Hubbard. 1980. Statistical analysis of results from irrigation experiments using the line source sprinkler system. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44:886-888.
  10. Hill, R. W., R. Newhall A. brain and N. Sheridan. 2000. Grass pastures response to water and nitrogen. Utah State University Extension, USA.
  11. Mose, S. B., Feil, B., Jampatong, S and Stamp, P. 2006. Effects of pre-anthesis drought, nitrogen fertilizer rate, and variety on grain yield, yield components, and harvest index of tropical maize.
  12. Agricultural Water Management. 81: 41-58.
  13. Niazi, J., Fooladmand, H. R. Ahmadi, S. H. and Vaziri, J. 2005."Water requirment and crop coefficient of wheat in Zarghan area Fars Province." J. Sci. & Technol. Agric. & Nature. Resour. 9(1): 1-8.
  14. Papadopoulos, I. 1992. Fertigation of vegetables in plastic houses present situation and future prospects. Acta Hort., 233, 151-179.
  15. Paolo, E. D. and Rinaldi, M. 2008. Yield response of corn to irrigation and nitrogen fertilization in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research. 105: 202-210.
  16. Randall, G. W., Wells, K. L. and Hanway, J. J. 1985. Modern techniques in fertilizer application. In: fertilizer technology and use, England, O.P., P.P., 521-556. Soil Sci. Soci. Am. Inc. Madison, USA.
  17. Sidnu, A. and K. Sandnu 1992. Effect of method of urea application on barley. J. Research Pungab Agricultural University, 29:3:338-340.
  18. Yilmaz, A., H. Ekiz, B. Torun, I. Gultekin, S. Karanlik, S. A. Bagci, and I. Cakmak. Effect of different zinc application methods on grain yield and zinc concentration in wheat cultivars grown on zinc deficient- calcareous soils. J.Plant Nutrition. 20 (4 &5): 461- 471.