Compositional Nutrient Diagnosis in Sugar Beet

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Members of Scientific staff of Soil and Water Research Institute

2 Researcher of Soil and Water Research Institute

Abstract

Tissue nutrient status of high yielding plant populations can be a reference norm for evaluation of growth and achievement of optimal yield. Compositional reference norms derived from generic models are important. Yield data of 382 sugar beet fields was analyzed and, using mathematical approach, cumulative variance ratio function, and chi-squared distribution function, the low (n1= 259) and high (n2= 123) yielding subpopulations were separated from each other. Cutoff yield was obtained at 53.980 t.ha-1. Critical chi-squared value was found to be 7.3 and was confirmed by using data of leaf samples from 38 fields and Cate-Nelson statistical procedure. Preliminary CND norms of different elements were found as follows:  , ,, , ,   ,, , . Later, nutrient sufficiency range and critical intervals norms and nutrient indexes for CND were determined using analysis results of 38 sugar beet tissue samples. Satisfactory results were obtained when data of many fertilizer trials were investigated to arrive at preliminary validation of norms and indexes. These norms, indexes, nutrient sufficiency ranges, and critical intervals can be used for prediction of growth, yield, and nutrition disorders of sugar beet.

Keywords

References

  1. امامی، عاکفه. 1375. روش‌های تجزیه گیاه. مؤسسه تحقیقات خاک و آب. نشریه فنی شماره 982، تهران، ایران.
  2. دریاشناس، عبدالمحمد و علیرضا پاک نژاد.1384 .تعیین نرمهای استاندارد دریس برای چغندر قند پاییزه استان خوزستان. نهمین کنگره علوم خاک ایران، ایران، کرج، 6 تا 9 شهریور، 1384
  3. زالی، عباسعلی و جمشید جعفری شبستری. 1369. مقدمه ای بر احتمالات و آمار (ترجمه) انتشارات دانشگاه تهران 1896 چاپ سوم
  4. نیرومندی جهرمی، محمود. 1376. تعیین میزان مناسب کودهای ازته و فسفره در زراعت چغندر قند گزارش نهایی، شماره ثبت مرکز اطلاعات و مدارک علمی: 361/76 مورخ 16/9/76، ناشر:مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی فارس
  5. ملکوتی م. ج . پیمان کشاورز، و نجفعلی کریمیان. (1387). روش جامع تشخیص و ضرورت مصرف بهینه کود برای کشاورزی پایدار. انتشارات دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
  6. Aitchison, J. 1986. Statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman and Hall, New York.
  7. Bates, T.E. 1971. Factors affecting critical nutrient concentrations in plant and their evaluation: A review. Soil Sci. 112:116–130.
  8. Elwali, A.M.O. and G.J.Gacho .1984 . Soil testing ,foliar analysis, and DRIS as guides for sugarcane fertilization .Agron.J.76:466-470
  9. Jose L. Garcia-Hernandez, Ricardo D. Valdez- Cepeda, Narciso Y. Avila- Serrano, Bernardo Murillo- Amador, Alejandra Nieto- Garibay, Rafael Megallanes- Quintanar, Juan Larrinaga- Mayoral and Enriqur Troyo- Dieguez. (2005). Preliminary compositional nutrient diagnosis norms for cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) grown on desert calcareous soil .Plant and Soil. Volume 271, Numbers 1-2.pp 297-307.
  10. Khiari, L., L.E. Parent, and N. Tremblay. 2001a. Critical compositional nutrient indexes for sweet corn at early growth stage. Agron. J. 93:809–814
  11. Khiari, L., L.E. Parent, and N. Tremblay. 2001b . The Phosphorus  Compositional  Nutrient  Diagnosis  Range  For  Agron. J. 93:815–819
  12. Khiari, L., L.E. Parent, and N. Tremblay. 2001c. Selecting the high-yield subpopulation for diagnosing nutrient imbalance in crops. Agron. J. 93:802–808
  13. Nelson, A., and R.L. Anderson. 1977. Partitioning of soil test-crop response probability. p. 19–38. In M. Stelly (ed.) Soil testing: Correlating and interpreting the analytical results. ASA Spec. Publ. 29. ASA, Madison,
  14. Parent, L.E., and M. Dafir. 1992. A theoretical concept of compositional nutrient diagnosis. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 117:239–242
  15. Parent, L.E., L . Khiari . 2003 . The compositional  nutrient  diagnosis  of onions .xxxvi   international  horticultural  congress : Toward  ecologically  sound  fertilization  strategies  for  field  vegetable    http://www.actahort.org
  16. Parent, L.E., A.N. Cambouris, and A. Muhawenimana. 1994. Multivariate diagnosis of nutrient imbalance in potato crops. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58:1432–1438.
  17. Ross, S.M. 1987. Introduction to probability and statistics for engineers and scientists. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  18. Refael Magallanes-Quintanar, Ricardo David Valdez-Cepeda, Fidel Blanco-Macias, Miguel Marquez-Madrid, Raul Rene Ruiz- Garduno, Oscar Perez- Veyna, Jose Luis Garcia- Hernadez, Bernardo Murillo-Amador, Jose Dimas Lopez- Martinez, and Enrique Martinez- Rubin de Celis(2004). Compostional Nutrient Diganosis In Nopal (Opuntia ficus- indica).( on line).Available at http://www.Jpacd.org (verified 24 Mar .2009).
  19. Soltanpour, P. N., M. J. Malakouti, and A. Ronaghi. (1995). Comparison of diagnosis and recommendation in integrated system and nutrient sufficiency range for corn. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 59: 10. 133-139.
  20. Savoy, H.J., and D.L. Robinson. 1990. Norm range size effects in calculating Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System indexes. Agron. J. 82:592–596
  21. Tisdale, S.L , W.L.Nelson.,and J . D  Beaton (1993).Soil fertility and fertilizer. Macmillan USA. 648 page
  22. Ulrich , A . 1952 . Physiological bases for assessing the nutritional requirement of plants .Annu. Rev. Plant. Physio. 207-228 – Downloaded from www. Annualreviews.org
  23. Walworth, J.L., and M.E. Sumner. 1987. The Diagnosis and Recommendation Integrated System (DRIS). Adv. Soil Sci. 6:149–188.
Iranian Journal of Soil Research
Volume 25, Issue 1
June 2011
Pages 1-12

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics