Effects of Clay Content and Salinity on Volumetric Water Content Using Time Domain Reflectometry

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Graduate Student, Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

3 Assistant Professor Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Tehran, Karaj

4 MSc. Student of Soil Science Department, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

Abstract

Measurement of soil water content is important in hydrology, agriculture, and pedology. To this end, use of methods that can measure soil water content in a natural and safe condition with high speed and accuracy is very important. Recently, the use of Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) has become common for quick measurement of soil salinity and volumetric water content.  This study aimed to assess the effect of clay content and soil salinity on dielectric constant (volumetric water content) in saline and non–saline soils. At all five sites, both the topsoil (0–0.3 m depth) and the subsoil (0.3–0.6 m depth) were sampled. These soil samples were poured into 15-20 cylinders (sub-samples) depending on their clay content.  Afterwards, pure water was repeatedly added to some sub-samples at the rate of 0.025 m3 m-3, while the others received 0.03m3m-3 saline water ( EC of 0.41,0.81,1.53,2.6,3.49,4.71 dSm-1) in repeated doses until the water content was close to saturation in each subsample. The samples were then weighed and packed to reach the same bulk density as originally measured in the field. After 24-48 hrs, the TDR measurement was performed. Soil physico-chemical parameters, including organic matter, clay, silt, and sand contents and clay mineralogy were determined. The results showed that higher soil salinity increased soil dielectric constant i.e. both the rise time of the reflected signal and the total time delay increased, resulting in overestimation of soil moisture. The bound water in clay soil reduced the time delay because of its lower dielectric constant caused by specific surface area and affected on polarity of water near the particles, resulting in underestimation of soil water content. There is a turning point moisture, at which the effect of bound water is balanced by the effect of soil electrical conductivity. Also results show that only in one point linear model shows an accurate water measurement; below this point, bound water effect dominates and TDR underestimates soil moisture. Above this point, the effect of soil EC dominates and TDR overestimates soil moisture. This turning point moisture decreases as the soil salinity increases. Overall, the results show that for accurate measurement and avoidance of large errors in measurement of volumetric water content with TDR, salinity and mineralogy of clay content must be included in the calibration equation. 

Keywords

References

  1. De Loor, G.P. 1968. Dielectric properties of heterogeneous mixtures containing water. J. Microwave Power 3(2):67–73.
  2. Dirksen, C., and Dasberg, S. 1993. Improved Calibration of Time Domain Reflectomery Soil water Content Measurements. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57: 660-667.
  3. Friedman, S.P., 1998. A saturation degree-dependent composite spheres model for describing the effective dielectric constant of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour. Res. 34 (11): 2949–2961.

 

  1. Y, Q., and Z. sun.2003. The effects of soil bulk density, clay content and temperature on soil water content measurement using time-domain reflectometry.Hydrol.Process.17: 3601–3614.
  2. Gur, Y.I, Ravina, I., and Babchin, A. J. 1978, On the Electric Double Layer Theory. II. The Poisson – Boltzmann Equation Including Hydration Forces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 64:333-341.
  3. Hilhorst MA, Dirksen C, Kampers FWH, Feddes RA. 2001. Dielectric relaxation of bound water versus soil matric pressure. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.65: 311–314.
  4. Hook, W.R. and Livingston, J. 1995. Propagating Velocity Errors in Time Domain Reflectometry Measurement of Soil Water. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 59:92-96.
  5. Jacobsen, O.H., Schjønning, P. 1993. A laboratory calibration of time domain reflectometry for soil water measurement including effects of bulk density and texture. J. Hydrol. 151: 147–157.
  6. Malicki MA, Walczak RT, Koch S, Fluhler H. 1994. Determining soil salinity from simultaneous readings of its electrical conductivity and permittivity using TDR. In Symposium and Workshop on Time Domain Reflectometry in Environmental, Infrastructure, and MiningApplications, United States Department of Interior Bureau of Mines: 328–336.
  7. Metsik, M.S. 1972. Properties of water films between mica plates. In: Surface forces in the thin films and disperse systems. (Svojstva vodnich plenok mezhdu plastinkami slyudy. In: Poverkhnostniye sily v tonkhikh plenkakh) (In Russian). Nauka Publishers, Moscow, pp.189–196.
  8. Or D, Wraith JM. 1999. Temperature effects on soil bulk dielectric permittivity measured by time domain reflectometry: a physical model. Resources Research 35: 371–833Water.
  9. Cosenza, A. Tabbagh. 2004. Electromagnetic determination of clay water content:role of the microporosity .Clay Science 26: 21– 36.
  10. Rhoades, J.D., Manteghi, N.A., Shouse, P.J., Alves, W.J., 1989. Soil electrical conductivity and salinity: new formulations and calibrations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53: 433–439.
  11. Roth, K., Schulin, R., Fluhler, H., and and Attinger, W. 1990. Calibration of time domain reflectometry for water content measurement using a composite dielectric approach. Water Resour. Res. 26:2267-2273
  12. Shang, J. Q. 1994. Quantitative Determination of Potential Distribution in Stern-Gouy Double layer Model. Can. Geotech. J. 31: 624-636.
  13. Sun ZJ, Young GD, McFarlane R, Chambers BM. 2000. The effect of soil electrical conductivity on moisture determination using time domain- reflectometry in sandy soil.Canadian Journal of Soil Science 80(1): 13–22.
  14. Topp GC, Davis JL, Annan AP. 1980. Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: measurements in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resources Research 16: 574–582.
  15. Topp GC, Zeglin S, White 2000. Impacts of real and imaginary components of relative permittivity on time domain reflectometry measurements in soil.Soil Science Society of America Journal 64: 1244–1252.
  16. White, I., Knight, J.H., Zegelin, S.J., and Topp, G.C. 1994, Comments on ‘Consideration on the use of time-domain reflectometry (TDR) for measuring soil water content’ by W.R. Whalley.Euro. J. Soil Sci. 45: 503-508.
  17. Wyseure, G.C.L., Mojid, M.A., Malik, M.A. 1997. Measurement of volumetric water content by TDR in saline soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 48: 347–354.
Iranian Journal of Soil Research
Volume 25, Issue 2
September 2011
Pages 103-112

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics