Drought Monitoring with Palmer Drought Severity Index(PDSI) Based on Estimated Moisture Data from Soil Moisture Balance: A Case Study on Khorasan Area

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Researcher, Ferdowsi University

Abstract

Drought is long periods when precipitation falls below normal, and consequently causes shortage of water resources in the affected regions. Drought results in serious economic, social and environmental impacts. Drought is known as a complicated natural hazard, which is very difficult to be understood fully or described Clearly. We tried to clarify the problem by investigating drought patterns and severity during a long period of 31 years (1970-2001), using climatic data for Khorasan province, I.R.Iran. The investigation showed that general changes for dry periods are more or less uniform over the province. We realized that drought (sever or moderate) occurs time and time in the region and actually is a part of the province climate. We also concluded that on average moderate/mild drought has occurred once every two years; while sever/extreme drought occurs once every 6 or 7 years. It should be noticed that drought severity and duration is different as one moves from the south to the central and northern parts of the province. It is, also, clear that droughts recurrences, severities and durations have been increased during recent years. The most sever drought has been occurred during 1970 and 1990. Comparing the index for different months, we concluded that a long duration drought is made of few merged short period droughts with different severities. Finally we realized that Palmer index is a suitable index for drought monitoring, even though there are some criticism, which challenge the index.

Keywords


  1. Alley, W.M. 1984. The Palmer Drought Severity Index: Limitations and Assumptions. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 23:1100 - 1109.
  2. Attila, B. and C. Szinell. 1996. Drought Continues in Hungary in 1995. Issue of Drought Network News [On-line], 3. Available on the WWW:url:http://enso. unl.Edu/ndmc.
  3. Banks, W.G. and S. Little. 1964. The Forest of April 1963 in New Jersey Point the way to Better Protection and Managment. Five Control Notes, 25:3-6.
  4. Brotak, E.A. and W.E. Refssnyder. 1977. An Investigation of the Synoptic Situation Associated with Major Wildland Fires. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 16:867-870.
  5. Bussay, A., M. Hayes, Cs. Szinell and M. Svoboda. 2000. Monitoring Drought in Hungary with the Standardized Precipitation Index. Journal of Water International, 15:339-345.
  6. Haines, D.A., V.J. Johanson and W.A. Main. 1976. An Assessment of three Measures of Long Term Moisture Deficiency before Critical Fire Periods. USDA Forest Service Reserch NC-131, 13pp.
  7. Heddinghause, T.R. and P. Sabol. 1991. A Review of the Palmer Drought Severity Index and Where Do We Go from Here?, Journal of Climatology, 2:313-329.
  8. Eder, B.K., M.J. Davis and J.F. Monahan. 1986. Spatial and Temporal Analysis of the Palmer Drought Severity Index Over the Southeastern United States:1895-1981. Journal of Climatology, 7:31-56.
  9. Guttman, N.B. 1991. A Sensitivity Analysis of the Palmer Hydrologic Drought Index. Water Resources Bulletin, 27:797-807.
  10. Guttman, N.B. 1998. Comparing the Palmer Drought Index and Standardized Precipitation Index. Journal of American Water Resource Association, 34:113-121.
  11. Guttman, N.B., J.R. Wallis and J.R.M. Hosking. 1992. Spatial Comparability of the Palmer Drought Severity Index. Water Resources Bulletin, 28:111-119.
  12. Karl, T.R. 1986. The Sensitivity of the Palmer Drought Severity Index and Palmer’s Z_Index to their Calibration Coefficients including Potential Evapotranspiration. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 25:77-86.
  13. Karl, T.R. and R.W. Knight. 1985. Atlas of Monthly Palmer Hydrological Drought Indices 1931-1983 for the Contiguous United State. Historical Climatology Series 3-7, National Climate Data Center, Asheville, Nc.
  14. Palmer, W.C. 1965. Meteorological Drought. Research. Paper No. 45, S. Department of Commerce Weather Bureau, Washington, D.C.
  15. Szalai, S., Cs. Szinell, A. Bussay and T. Szentimrey. 1998. Drought Tendencies in Hungary. Journal of Climatology, 18:1479-1491.
  16. WMO (World Meteorological Organization). 1995. Drought and Agriculture. WMO Technical Note, No. 138, Report of the CAgM Working Group on the Assessment of Drought, Geneva, Switzerland, WMO.