Investigating Spatial Variability of Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity and the Factors Affecting It in Different Layers of Soil Profile of Paddy Fields

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associated Professor, Soil and Water Research Institute, agricultural research, education and extension organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Tabriz University, Tabriz

3 Water Engineering Department, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

4 Rice Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht

10.22092/ijsr.2024.364156.732

Abstract

Spatial variability of soil hydraulic properties is important for soil-water balance and irrigation management in paddy fields. The objective of this study was to determine the spatial variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) and the factors affecting it. Soil samples from 120 profiles were collected using random stratified sampling scheme. Soil samples were taken from top soil, compacted plow pan, and non-saturated subsoil. In these samples, soil texture, organic carbon, bulk density, saturated moisture, and saturated hydraulic conductivity were measured (by the falling head method). The most heterogeneity with a maximum coefficient of variation (CV), positive skewness, and lognormal frequency distribution for Ks indicated preferential flow caused by the presence of biological pores and cracks from previous drought stress. The results of the geostatistical analysis showed that hydraulic conductivity followed spherical and exponent semi-variogram model in puddled top soil and the non-saturated subsoil, respectively. This variable followed linear semi-variogram model with low slope in plow pan. The CV of Ks in plow pan (299%) was 121% and 284% higher than, respectively, the upper and the lower layers. The closeness of the behavior of Ks to random variables in this layer was mainly due to the existence of biological pores and root channels and the movement of animals, which lead to preferential flow. Despite the weak and moderate spatial structure of the variables, the kriging interpolation method was more accurate for Ks compared to inverse distance weighting. The spatial distribution pattern of Ks in puddled top layer was inversely related to clay content. Despite the high clay content in the west half of the study area, the Ks values in this region were high due to the presence of biopores. These results indicate that the compacted plow pan cannot play its key role for reducing hydraulic conductivity and retaining water in the soil. The magnitude and spatial variability of soil hydraulic conductivity and the factors affecting it depend on the site-specific irrigation management.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Azadmard, B., M.R. Mosaddeghi, S. Ayoubi, S. Chavoshi, and M. Raoof. 2018. Spatial variability of near-saturated soil hydraulic properties in Moghan plain, North-Western Iran. Arab. J. Geosci. 11: 452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3788-8
  2. Bechini, L., S. Bocci, and T. Maggiore. Spatial interpolation of soil physical properties for irrigation planning. A simulation study in northernItaly. Eur. J. Agron. 19: 1-14.
  3. Booltink, H.W.G., and J. Buma. 2002. Steady flow soil column method. P. 812- 814. In J.H. Dane and G.C. Clake (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4. Physical Methods. SSSA Book Series, No. 5. Madison, Wisconsin, USA,
  4. Bouma, J. 1991. Influence of soil macroporosity on environmental quality. Adv. Agron. 46: 1- 37.
  5. Burrough, P.A. 1983. Multiscale sources of spatial variability in soil. I. The implication of fractal concepts to nested levels of soil variation. Soil Sci. J. 34: 577- 597.
  6. Cahn, M.D., J.M. Hummel and B.H. Brouer. 1994. Spatial analysis of soil fertility for site- specific crop management. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58: 1240- 1248.
  7. Cambarella, C.A., T.B. Moorman, J.M. Novak, T.B. Parkin, D.L. Karlen, R.F. Turco and A.E. Konopka. 1994. Field- scale. Variability of soil properties in central Iowa soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58: 1501- 1511.
  8. Campbell, G.S. 1985. Soil physics with Basic- Transport Models for Soil- Plant Systems. Elsevier, New York.
  9. Centeno, L.N., W. Hu, L.C. Timm, D. She, D. da Silva Ferreira, W.S. Barros, S. Beskow and T.L. Caldeira. 2020. Dominant control of macroporosity on saturated soil hydraulic conductivity at multiple scales and locations revealed by wavelet analyses. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 20: 1686–1702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00239-5.
  10. Da Silva, G.S., J.S. Da Silva, F.A. De Carvalho, R.A. Santana, R.S. Firmo and O.P. Sobrinhom. 2019. Spatial variability of the saturated hydraulic conductivity of soil in cocoa farming in RecôncavoBaiano. Revista Caatinga32(3): 786-794. DOI: 1590/1983-21252019v32n323rc
  11. De Datta, S.K. 1986. Technology development and spread of direct-seeded flooded rice in Southeast Asia. Experimental Agriculture, 22: 417-426.
  12. Deurer, M. and W. Duijnisveld. 2000. Spatial analysis of water characteristic functions in a sandy podzol under pine forest. Water Resour. Res. 36(10): 2925–2935.
  13. Dobermann, A., and T. Oberthur. 1997. Fuzzy mapping of soil fertility- a case study on irrigated rice land in the Phillipines. Geoderma, 77: 317. 339.
  14. Gee, G.W., and D. Or. 2002. Particle- size analysis. p. 255-294. In J.H., Dane and G.C. Clake (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4. Physical Methods. SSSA Book Series, no. 5. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp.
  15. Godoy, V.A., L.V. Zuquette and J.J. Gómez-Hernández. 2019. Spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and solute transport parameters and their spatial correlations to soil properties. Geoderma, 339: 59–69.
  16. Gooverats, P. 1997. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York.
  17. Grossman, R.B., and T.G. Reinsch. 2002. Bulk density and linear extensibility.p. 201-228. In J. H., Dane and G.C. Clake (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4. Physical Methods. SSSA Book Series, No. 5. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  18. Gumiere, S.J., J.A. Lafond, D.W. Hallema, Y. Périard, J. Caron and J. Gallichand. 2014. Mapping soil hydraulic conductivity and matric potential for water management of cranberry: characterisation and spatial interpolation methods. Biosyst. Eng. 128: 29–40.
  19. Gupta, N., R.P. Rudra, and G. Parkin. 2006. Analysis of spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity at field scale. Canadian Biosystems Engineering, 48: 55-62.
  20. Gupta, S.D., B.P. Mohanty and J.M. Kohne. 2006. Soil hydraulic conductivities and their spatial and temporal variation in a vertisol. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 70: 1827-1881.
  21. Iqbal, J., J.A. Thomasson, J.N. Jenkins, P.R. Owens and F.D. Whisler. 2005. Spatial variability analysis of soil physical properties of alluvial soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69(4): 1338-1350.‏
  22. Isaaks, E.H., and R.M. Srivastava. 1989. Applied Geostatistics, Oxford University press, New York.
  23. Jang, C.S., and C.W. Liu. 2004. Geostatistical analysis and conditional simulation for estimating the spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity in the Choushui river alluvial fan, Taiwan. Hydrol. Processes. 18: 1333-1350.
  24. Kobayashi, K., and M. U. Salam. 2000. Comparing simulated and measured values using mean squared deviation and its components. Agron. J. 92: 345-352.
  25. Kosugi, K., and W. Hopmans. 1998. Scaling water retention curves for soils with lognormal pores-size distribution. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62: 1496- 1505.
  26. Kravchenko, A., and D.C. Bullouk. 1999. A comparative study of interpolation methods for mapping soil properties. Agron. J. 91: 393-400.
  27. Kravchenko, A.N. 2003. Influence of spatial structure on accuracy of interpolation methods. Soil Sci. Am. J. 67: 1564- 1571.
  28. Li, Y., D. Chen, R.E. White, A. Zhu and J. Zhang. 2007. Estimating soil hydraulic properties of Fengqiu County soils in the North China Plain using pedo-transfer functions. Geoderma, 138: 261–271.
  29. Lin, H.S., K. Mc Innes, L.P. Wilding and C.T. Hallmark. 1998. Macroporosity and initial moisture effects on infilteration rates in verstisols and vertic intergrades. Soil Sci. J. 163: 2- 8.
  30. Logsdon, S.D. 2002. Determination of preferential flow model parameters. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66: 1095- 1103.
  31. Lu, G.Y., and D.W. Wang. 2008. An adaptive inverse-distance weighting spatial interpolation technique. Comput. Geosci. 34: 1044-1055.
  32. Mallants, D., B.P. Mohanty, A. Vervoort and J. Feyen. 1997. Spatial analysis of saturated hydraulic conductivity in a soil with macropores. Soil Technol. 10: 115-131.
  33. Mallants, D., B.P. Mohanty, D. Jacques and J. Feyen. 1996. Spatial variability of hydraulic properties in a multi-layered soil profile. Soil Sci. J.101: 167-181.
  34. McGrath, D., and C. Zhang. 2003. Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon concentrations in grassland of Ireland. Appl. Geochem. 18: 1624- 1639.
  35. Mertens, J., D. Jacques, J. Vanderborght and J. Feyen. 2002. Characterisation of the field saturated hydraulic conductivity on a hillslope: in situ single ring pressure infiltrometer measurements. J. 263: 217–229.
  36. Moormann, F.R., and N. Van Breeman. 1978. Rice: Soil Water, Land. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines.
  37. Mueller, T.G., F.J. Pierce, O. Schabenberger and D.D. Warncke. 2001. Map quality for site- specific fertility management. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65:1547-1558.
  38. Phillips, J.D. 1993. Stability implications of the state factor model of soils as a nonlinear dynamic system. Geoderma, 58: 1- 15.
  39. Reynolds, W.D., B.T. Bowman, R.R. Brunke, C.F. Drury and C.S. Tan. 2000. Comparison of tension infiltrometer, pressure infiltrometer, and soil core estimates of saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64: 478–484.
  40. Robinson, T. P., and G. Metternicht. 2006. Testing the performance of spatial interpolation techniques for mapping soil properties. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 50: 97-108.
  41. Romano, N. 1993. Use of an inverse method and geostatistics to estimate soil hydraulic conductivity for spatial variability analysis. Geoderma, 60: 169- 186.
  42. Sendecor, G.W., and W.G. Cochran. 1980. Statistical methods. 7th ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.
  43. Sepaskhah, A.R., S.H. Ahmadi and A.N. Shahbazi. 2005. Geostatistical analysis of sorptivity for a soil under tilled and no-tilled conditions. Soil Tillage Res. 83(2): 237-245.‏
  44. Sharma, P.K. and S.K., De Datta. 1985. Effects of puddling on soil physical properties and processes. In: Soil Physics and Rice. International Rice Research Institute, Los Bafios, Philippines, pp. 217-2
  45. Sobieraj, J.A., H. Elsenbeer and G. Cameron. 2004. Scale dependency in spatial patterns of saturated hydraulic conductivity. Catena, 55: 49-77.
  46. Soulis, K.X., P.A. Londra and G. Kargas. 2020. Characterizing surface soil layer saturated hydraulic conductivity in a Mediterranean natural watershed. Hydrol. Sci. J. 65 (15): 2616-2629. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1831694© 2020 IAHS
  47. Toung, T.P., M.S.C. Wopereis, J.A. Marques and M.J. Kropff. 1994. Mechanisms and control of percolation losses in puddle rice fields. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58: 1794-1803.
  48. Usowicz, B., and J. Lipiec. 2021. Spatial variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity and its links with other soil properties at the regional scale. Scientific Reports. 11: 8293. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86862-3
  49. Villagra-Mendoza, K., and R. Horn. 2018. Effect of biochar on the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of two amended soils. Int. Agrophys. 32: 373–378.
  50. Wang, Y., M.A. Shao and Z. Liu. 2012. Pedotransfer functions for predicting soil hydraulic properties of the Chinese Loess Plateau. Soil Sci. 177: 424–432.
  51. Warrick, A.W., and H.M. Vanes. 2002. Soil sampling and statistical procedures. p. 1- 195. In J.H., Dane and G. C. Topp (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4. Physical Methods. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  52. Wopereis, M.C.S., J.H.M. Wosten, J. Bouma and T. Woodhead. 1992. Hydraulic resistance in puddled rice soils: measurement and effects on water movement. Soil & Tillage Research. 24: 199-209.
  53. Wopereis, M.C.S., M.J. Kropff., J.H.M. Wosten and J. Bouma. 1993. Sampling strategies for measurement of soil hydraulic properties to predict rice yield using simulation models. Geoderma, 59: 1- 20.
  54. Young, F.G., R.D. Hammer and D. Larsen. 1999. Frequency distribution of soil properties on a loess- mantled Missouri watershed. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63: 178- 185.
  55. Zeleke, T.B., and B.C. Si. 2005. Scaling relationships between saturated hydraulic conductivity and soil physical properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69: 1691-1702.
  56. Zhang, X., O. Wendroth, C. Matocha, J. Zhu and J. Reyes. 2020. Assessing field-scale variability of soil hydraulic conductivity at and near saturation. Catena, 187: 104335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104335

 

Iranian Journal of Soil Research
Volume 38, Issue 1
August 2024
Pages 1-24

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics