اثر کاربرد گوگرد بر شاخص‏های رشد نهال نارنج و برخی ویژگی‏های یک خاک غیرآهکی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار پژوهشکده مرکبات و میوه‌های نیمه‌گرمسیری، مؤسسه تحقیقات علوم باغبانی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، رامسر

2 استادیار پژوهش، پژوهشکده چای، موسسه تحقیقات علوم باغبانی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، لاهیجان، ایران

10.22092/ijsr.2023.360511.684

چکیده

این پژوهش با هدف بررسی تاثیر کاربرد گوگرد با و بدون کود گاوی بر شاخص­های رشد نهال جوان نارنج و نیز شاخص‏های کیفی یک خاک غیرآهکی (8/6pH=) اجرا شد. بدین منظور هشت تیمار مختلف شامل کاربرد گوگرد به تنهایی و یا به‌صورت توأم با کود گاوی با هدف تأمین 10، 20 و 30 گرم گوگرد در هر کیلوگرم خاک درنظرگرفته شد. هشت ماه پس از کاشت نهال‏ها، گیاهان برداشت شد و وزن شاخسار و نیز غلظت عناصر غذایی در برگ نهال اندازه‏گیری شد. هم‌چنین در پایان آزمایش، برخی ویژگی‌های زیستی و شیمیایی معرف کیفیت خاک در نمونه خاک‌های پیرامون ریشه نهال نارنج تعیین گردید. بررسی نتایج نشان داد که اثرات ترکیبی گوگرد و کود گاوی بر شاخص‌های رشد نهال نارنج و نیز شاخص‌های کیفیت خاک بیشتر از اثرات هریک از این اصلاح‌کننده های خاک به تنهایی بود. هم‌چنین، کاربرد 10 گرم گوگرد دارای اثرات مثبتی بر وزن شاخساره نارنج و نیز غلظت فسفر، کلسیم، آهن و روی در برگ نارنج بود و این اثرات مثبت در شرایط کاربرد کود گاوی ارتقا بخشیده شد. هم‌چنین با افزایش سطح کاربرد گوگرد، پهاش خاک کاهش یافت و این کاهش در شرایط کاربرد توأم گوگرد و کود گاوی بیشتر بود. هم­چنین نتایج نشان داد که مقدار قابل استفاده فسفر، پتاسیم، کلسیم، سولفات، روی و آهن در خاک متاثر از سطح کاربرد گوگرد بود. علاوه براین، با کاربرد 10 گرم گوگرد مقدار هدایت‏الکتریکی خاک افزایش یافت هرچند افزایش سطح کاربرد گوگرد منجر به افزایش بیشتر این ویژگی نشد. هم‌چنین، بیشترین فعالیت آنزیم فسفاتاز قلیایی و اسیدی در شرایط کاربرد 10 گرم گوگرد به‌صورت توأم با کود گاوی به دست آمد. به‌طورکلی، نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که کاربرد مقادیر بیشتر از 20 گرم گوگرد بر رشد شاخسار نارنج و نیز فعالیت‌های زیستی اندازه‌گیری شده در خاک مورد مطالعه اثر ممانعت‌کننده ای داشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Sulfur Application Effect on Sour Orange Seedling Growth Indices and Some Characteristics of a Non-Calcareous Soil

نویسندگان [English]

  • Tahere Raiesi 1
  • Ehsan Kahne 2
1 Citrus and Subtropical Fruit Research Centre, Horticultural Science Research Institute, Agricultural Research and Education Organization (AREO), Ramsar 46915, Iran
2 Assistant Prof., Tea Research Center, Horticultural Science Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Lahijan, Iran
چکیده [English]

The present research aimed to study the effects of S application with and without cow manure on growth indices of young sour orange (SO) seedlings and on some chemical and biological properties of a non-calcareous soil (pH= 6.8). In this experiment, eight different treatments, including the application of S at four levels (0, 10, 20, and 30 g-S per kg-soil) with or without cow manure were used. Eight months after planting, seedlings were harvested, and shoot weight and the concentration of nutrients including phosphorus, potassium, calcium, iron, and zinc in the leaves of the seedlings were measured. Additionally, at the end of the experiment, the soils around the SO root were sampled and some biological and chemical properties including the activity of phosphatase enzymes, microbial respiration, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and the cation exchange capacity were determined. The results showed that the combined application of S and cow manure had a more pronounced effect on the growth indices of SO seedlings and soil quality indices than S and cow manure applied alone. Also, application of 10 g S had positive effects on the shoot’s weight and the concentration of P, Ca, Fe, and Zn in SO leaves and these positive effects were more pronounced in the combined application of S with cow manure. Also, with increasing the level of S application, soil pH decreased, and this decrease was more in the combined application of S and cow manure conditions. Additionally, the available amount of P, K, Ca, sulfate, Zn and Fe in the soil was affected by the level of sulfur application. Application of 10 g of S increased soil EC, although increasing the level of S application did not lead to a further increase in this parameter. The highest activity of alkaline and acidic phosphatase enzymes was obtained in the application of 10 g of S in combination with cow manure. In general, the results of this study showed that application of more than 20 g of S had an inhibitory effect on the growth of SO shoots and biological parameters under study.  

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cow manure
  • Biological parameters
  • Soil quality indices
  • Leaf nutrient content
  • Phosphatase enzymes

مراجع

  1. رضائی، ش.، خاوازی، ک.، نظامی، م.ط. و سعادت، س. 1392. تأثیر گوگرد، فسفر و نقش گیاه بر زیست توده میکروبی و فعالیت فسفاتازهای خاک. پژوهش های خاک، 27(2): 217-226.
  2. مجیدی، ع. 1395. تاثیر مقادیر و منابع گوگرد بر رشد و برخی خواص کیفی میوه سیب رقم زرد. مجله مدیریت خاک و تولید پایدار، 6: 25-44.
  3. Acosta-Martínez, V., and Tabatabai, M.A. 2000. Enzyme activities in a limed agricultural soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 31(1): 85–91.
  4. Ansar, M.H., Hashemabadi, D., and Kaviani, B. 2017. Effect of Cattle Manure and Sulfur on Yield and Oil Composition of Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo Styriaca) Inoculated with Thiobacillus thiooxidans in Calcareous Soil. Commun. in Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 48(18): 2103–2118.
  5. Bastida, F., Zsolnay, A., Hernández, T., and García, C. 2008. Past, present and future of soil quality indices: A biological perspective. Geoderma 147(3): 159–171.
  6. Bouranis, D.L., Chorianopoulou, S.N., Margetis, M., Saridis, G.I., and Sigalas, P.P. 2018. Effect of elemental sulfur as fertilizer ingredient on the mobilization of iron from the iron pools of a calcareous soil cultivated with durum wheat and the crop’s iron and sulfur nutrition. Agriculture 8(2): 20.
  7. Brady, N.C., Weil, R.R., and Weil, R.R. 2008. The nature and properties of soils (Vol. 13). Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  8. Brejda, J.J., Moorman, T.B., Karlen, D.L., and Dao, T.H. 2000. Identification of regional soil quality factors and indicators I. Central and Southern High Plains. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64(6): 2115–2124.
  9. Bremner, J.M. 1996. Nitrogen‐total. p. 1085–1121. In D.L. Sparks et al. (eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3 Chemical Methods. SSSA, Madison, WI.
  10. Chapman, H.D. 1965. Cation‐exchange capacity. p. 891–901. In A.G. Norman (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties. SSSA, Madison, WI.
  11. Chen, D., Li, J., Lan, Z., Hu, S., and Bai, Y. 2016. Soil acidification exerts a greater control on soil respiration than soil nitrogen availability in grasslands subjected to long‐term nitrogen enrichment. Funct. Ecol. 30(4): 658–669.
  12. Dick, R.P., and Kandeler, E. 2005. Enzymes in soils. p. 448–456. In E. Hillel (ed.) Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment, Vol. 1. Elsevier Ltd., Oxford.
  13. Divito, G.A., Echeverría, H.E., Andrade, F.H., and Sadras, V.O. 2015. Diagnosis of S deficiency in soybean crops: Performance of S and N: S determinations in leaf, shoot and seed. Field Crops Res. 180: 167-175.
  14. Doll, E.C., and Lucas, R.E. 1973. Testing soil for potassium, calcium and magnesium. p 133-152. In L.M. Walsh and J.D. Beaton. (eds.) Soil testing and plant analysis. SSSA Madison, WI.
  15. Eivazi, F., and Tabatabai, M.A. 1977. Phosphatases in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 9(3): 167–172.
  16. El-Wakeel, H., and Mansour, N. 2014. Fertilizing young navel orange trees with sulfur and wood ash as a source of sustainable agriculture. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol, 6: 50–58.
  17. Gee, G.H., and Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle size analysis. p. 383-409. In A. Klute (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2 physical properties. SSSA, Madison, WI.
  18. Gupta, V., Lawrence, J.R., and Germida, J.J. 1988. Impact of elemental sulfur fertilization on agricultural soils. I. Effects on microbial biomass and enzyme activities. Can. J. Soil Sci. 68(3): 463–473.
  19. Hashemimajd, K., Farani, T.M., and Jamaati-e-Somarin, S. 2012. Effect of elemental sulphur and compost on pH, electrical conductivity and phosphorus availability of one clay soil. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 11(6): 1425–1432.
  20. Helmke, Ph.A., and Sparks, D.L. 1996. Lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium and cesium. In D.L. Sparks (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3 chemical methods. SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  21. Hemmaty, S., Dilmaghani, M.R., and Naseri, L. 2012. Effects of sulfur application on soil pH and uptake of phosphorus, iron and zinc in apple trees. J. plant physiol. breed. 2(1): 1–10.
  22. Kalra, Y. 1997. Handbook of reference methods for plant analysis. CRC press.
  23. Lindsay, W.L., and Norvell, W.A., 1978. Development of DTPA test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42:421-428.
  24. Malik, K.M., Khan, K.S., Billah, M., Akhtar, M.S., Rukh, S., Alam, S., Munir, A., Mahmood Aulakh, A., Rahim, M., and Qaisrani, M.M. 2021. Organic Amendments and Elemental Sulfur Stimulate Microbial Biomass and Sulfur Oxidation in Alkaline Subtropical Soils. Agron. 11(12): 2514.
  25. Masuda, S., Bao, Z., Okubo, T., Sasaki, K., Ikeda, S., Shinoda, R., Anda, M., Kondo, R., Mori, Y., and Minamisawa, K. 2016. Sulfur fertilization changes the community structure of rice root-, and soil-associated bacteria. Microbes Environ. ME15170.
  26. Murovhi, N.R. 2012. Effect of different rates of sulphur fertilization on fruit yield and leaf mineral composition of ’Valencia ‘oranges in the subtropical environment of South Africa. II All Africa Horticulture Congress 1007: 303–310.
  27. Murphy, J., and Riley, J.P. 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal. Chim. Acta. 27: 31–36.
  28. Nannipieri, P., Giagnoni, L., Landi, L., and Renella, G. 2011. Role of phosphatase enzymes in soil. p. 215–243. In E. Bünemann, A. Oberson, E. Frossard, (eds.) Phosphorus in Action. Soil Biology, vol 26. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  29. Nelson, D.W., and Sommers, L.E. 1996. Total carbon organic carbon and organic matter. p. 961-1011. In D.L. Sparks (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3, chemical methods. SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  30. Nelson, P.N., and Su, N. 2010. Soil pH buffering capacity: a descriptive function and its application to some acidic tropical soils. Soil Res. 48(3): 201–207.
  31. Olsen, S.R. and Sommers, L.E. 1982 Phosphorus. p. 403-427. In A.L. Page, R.H. Miller, D.R. Keeney, (eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties. SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  32. Pascual, J.A., Garcia, C., Hernandez, T., Moreno, J.L., and Ros, M. 2000. Soil microbial activity as a biomarker of degradation and remediation processes. Soil Biol Biochem. 32(13): 1877–1883.
  33. Raiesi, T., and Moradi, B. 2021. Young navel orange rootstock improves phosphorus absorption from poorly soluble pools through rhizosphere processes. Rhizosphere 17: 100316.
  34. Rezapour, S. 2014. Effect of sulfur and composted manure on SO4-S, P and micronutrient availability in a calcareous saline–sodic soil. Chem Ecol. 30(2): 147–155.
  35. Rhoades, J.D. 1996. Salinity Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. p. 417-437. In D.L. Sparks (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3, chemical methods. SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  36. Sharma, I.P., Chandra, S., Kumar, N., and Chandra, D. 2017. PGPR: heart of soil and their role in soil fertility. p. 51–67. In V. Meena et al. (eds.) Agriculturally important microbes for sustainable agriculture. Springer, Singapore.
  37. Sys, C., Van, R., Debaveye, J., and Beernaert, F. 1993. Land evaluation part III crop requirement agricultural No. 7. General Administration for Development Cooperation Brussels-Belgium.
  38. Tabak, M., Lisowska, A., Filipek-Mazur, B., and Antonkiewicz, J. 2020. The Effect of Amending Soil with Waste Elemental Sulfur on the Availability of Selected Macro-elements and Heavy Metals. Processes 8(10): 1245.
  39. Tabatabai, M.A., and Bremner, J.M. 1969. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem. 1(4): 301–307.
  40. Tarafdar, J.C., and Claassen, N. 1988. Organic phosphorus compounds as a phosphorus source for higher plants through the activity of phosphatases produced by plant roots and microorganisms. Biol. Fertil. Soils 5(4): 308–312.
  41. Thiele-Bruhn, S., Schloter, M., Wilke, B.M., Beaudette, L.A., Martin-Laurent, F., Cheviron, N., Mougin, C., and Römbke, J. 2020. Identification of new microbial functional standards for soil quality assessment. Soil 6(1): 17–34.
  42. Thomas, G.W. 1996. Soil pH and soil acidity. p. 475-491. In D.L. Sparks (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3 chemical methods. SSSA, Madison, WI.
  43. Wang, Y., Li, Q., Hui, W., Shi, J., Lin, Q., Chen, X., and Chen, Y. 2008. Effect of sulphur on soil Cu/Zn availability and microbial community composition. J. Hazard. Mater. 159(2–3): 385–389.
  44. Williams, C.H., and Steinbergs, A. 1959. Soil sulphur fractions as chemical indices of available sulphur in some Australian soils. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 10(3): 340–352.
  45. Xu, R., Zhao, A., Yuan, J., and Jiang, J. 2012. pH buffering capacity of acid soils from tropical and subtropical regions of China as influenced by incorporation of crop straw biochar. J. Soils Sediments.12(4): 494–502.
  46. Zekri, M., and Obreza, T. 2013. Calcium (Ca) and sulfur (S) for citrus trees. The Soil and Water Science Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida: Gainesville, FL, USA.
  47. Zhou, G.F., Peng, S.A., Liu, Y.Z., Wei, Q.J., Han, J., and Islam, M.Z. 2014. The physiological and nutritional responses of seven different citrus rootstock seedlings to boron deficiency. Trees. 28(1): 295–307.
پژوهش های خاک
دوره 36، شماره 4
اسفند 1401
صفحه 389-403

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار